This is in addition to the MAJOR classic titles that Warner confirmed last year were likely to hit Blu-ray in 2009, including The Wizard of Oz, Gone with the Wind and North by Northwest.
http://www.thedigitalbits.com/rumormill.html#013009
Moderator: Marty McFly
This is in addition to the MAJOR classic titles that Warner confirmed last year were likely to hit Blu-ray in 2009, including The Wizard of Oz, Gone with the Wind and North by Northwest.
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus 


Marty McFly wrote:There are rumours that NORTH BY NORTHWEST, my favourite film of all time is going to get a 50th Anniversary this November.
Marty McFly wrote:Nothing wrong with "old" films Batman. One day the Fast and Furious films and The Dark Knight will be 100 years-old too. You wouldn't want people to stop watching them just because there old, so why do the same to other films of the past?
Batman wrote:They will but i don't think they will have the same effect on people as the likes of this did on the people of today.

Marty McFly wrote:Batman wrote:They will but i don't think they will have the same effect on people as the likes of this did on the people of today.
I understand what your saying with the rest of your post, but I don't quite get this bit - could you elaborate a little?
what I meant was the likes of Fast and Furious wont have the same affect on people in the future as the likes of North by Northwest did on the people of today.
I would love to watch more Older films to take more of a different look on Older films and by your recomendations Marty so far i have not been dissapointed.
Marty McFly wrote: Alfred Hitchcock's films are the work of a true cinematic master. A one of a kind. His films will be analysed and dissected as long as there exists cinema. I think the only comparable figure in modern Hollywood cinema today is Martin Scorsese and even he falls short of the mastery of the format displayed by Hitchcock but he's the closest we've got and he's made at least one film that is equal quality to Hitchcock's work (Goodfellas).
Marty McFly wrote:I'm glad you've enjoyed the selections I have recommended to you thus far Batman. Being a film fan can be a magical journey, and I am happy to have opened some doors to some wondrous cinematic worlds for you.
The only Hitchcock film i have seen to date is Physco I watched this back in school for GCSE (later pulled for some reason and had to do it on Bend it Like Beckham poor choice of film) i thought it was good looking back onit at the time I wasn't a huge fan of films I more saw them as time passsers but as years went by i became to see them in a different light as art form and became more obsssesed with them in a different way before and i have to sat Physco is a well directed film espesially the "SHOWERS SCENE" so from the little i know about Hitchcock his work seems truelly brilliant. As For Matyin Scorsese I have seen a film that hasn't been near perfect for him Casino, The Departed etc I would also love to see his film Taxi Driver I heard some positively great points of view for it.
Marty McFly wrote:Psycho was the first movie to say that audience members had to see it from the START! Before that, you could go into a cinema at any point during the movie. So people would go in halfway through a film, the film would then play in a complete loop and then they would leave once the film came to the point which it was at when they first arrived.
Marty McFly wrote: Hitchcock said that this was unacceptable for Psycho because it would ruin the films surprise.
Batman wrote:Marty McFly wrote:Psycho was the first movie to say that audience members had to see it from the START! Before that, you could go into a cinema at any point during the movie. So people would go in halfway through a film, the film would then play in a complete loop and then they would leave once the film came to the point which it was at when they first arrived.
Wow i can not believe people ever did that its jus beyond me. Im So happy you can't do this now I would hate it to be like this now.
Batman wrote:Wow that is truely amazing. It just goes to show how much the past in films has a massive effect of films of today. Cinema experiance have changed dramtically in years of how now it is like alot of people go as time killer which has put many Film addicts going as these people cause distractions I wish they brought in stricter policies.
Marty McFly wrote: In the mid-20s through to the early 50s cinema was a communal affair, people who go to the cinema to watch many hours worth of material including things such as newsreels, cartoon shorts, short films and then the main feature. People would bring picnics etc. So in many ways, even the more distracting members of the audience are nothing new!

Marty McFly wrote:Again, that's debatable. What would you find more distracting - a mobile phone screen or the cinema projector EXPLODING into flames?
You see that was known to happen back at the beginning of cinema since film was made out of the highly volatile nitrocellulose. In the early 1920s projectors where housed at the back of the cinema just behind the back seats of the cinema. However since people kept dying and being badly injured due to the projectors bursting into flames, they decided to move the projector into its own room as a safety pro-caution and the projection booth was born.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest